<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - judicial elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/598/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Taking a Special Interest</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/05/taking-a-special-interest</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt; has consistently supported public financing of elections, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/11/our-view-on-fil.html#more&quot;&gt;in this article &lt;/a&gt;which critiques the influence of special interest money in judicial elections, the paper praises efforts to offer a full public financing option for judicial races.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/05/taking-a-special-interest&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/05/taking-a-special-interest#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-elections">judicial elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">41601 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California Considers Changes to Judicial Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/09/05/california-considers-changes-to-judicial-elections</link>
 <description>Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William MacLaughlin &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metnews.com/articles/2007/judg090507.htm&quot;&gt;will head up a task force&lt;/a&gt; to evaluate judicial campaigns in the state and look at new models for campaign financing, including the possibility of creating a public financing option for California judicial candidates.  &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/09/05/california-considers-changes-to-judicial-elections&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/09/05/california-considers-changes-to-judicial-elections#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-elections">judicial elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">40935 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
