<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Utah</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/585/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Rules</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/20/new-rules</link>
 <description>On the campaign finance disclosure front a couple of states are looking to close some loopholes.  In California &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-gifts20-2008may20,0,5259059.story&quot;&gt;new ethics rules &lt;/a&gt;will require an explanation for luxury purchases made with campaign funds to ensure they&amp;#39;re necessary for the candidate to do his or her job. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_9317679&quot;&gt; Meanwhile, Utah&lt;/a&gt; is looking to clear up a worrying feature of their electronic campaign finance filing system that lets campaign edit and delete entries at will, with no record of it having been done.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/20/new-rules&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/20/new-rules#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/utah">Utah</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44457 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Big Waste</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/16/big-waste</link>
 <description>How comfortable are you with the idea that the metric by which we determine how nuclear waste is disposed of &lt;a href=&quot;http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ikxSLwXCpx4eChE4KVDfqlt3qD3wD902S4080&quot;&gt;could be campaign contributions?&lt;/a&gt;  A Utah-based company seeking a contract to import nuclear waste for processing at their facility is throwing money at key members of Congress in an effort to advance their interests, over the objections of environmental groups.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/16/big-waste&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/16/big-waste#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/campaign-contributions">campaign contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/utah">Utah</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44000 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Utah Looks at Lobbyist Rules</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/05/utah-looks-at-lobbyist-rules</link>
 <description>A group of Republican legislators in Utah &lt;a href=&quot;http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695250247,00.html&quot;&gt;are putting ethics reform&lt;/a&gt; at the top of their list for this year with the goal of revising the guidelines on lobbyist gifts to lawmakers, the transfer of funds from one legislator&amp;#39;s campaign account to another, and the &amp;quot;personal expenses&amp;quot; that a lawmaker may legally cover using campaign funds. It&amp;#39;s not a Clean Elections proposal, but it&amp;#39;s a step towards greater transparency and accountability in the legislature.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/05/utah-looks-at-lobbyist-rules&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/05/utah-looks-at-lobbyist-rules#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/utah">Utah</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42774 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Utah Letter to the Editor</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/07/05/utah-letter-to-the-editor</link>
 <description>Ilona Jappinem of Logan, Utah has&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_6299325&quot;&gt; this letter to the editor&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;Salt Lake City Tribune&lt;/em&gt; advocating a Clean Elections program as the way forward in light of the recent Supreme Court decision weakening provisions of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.  &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/07/05/utah-letter-to-the-editor&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/07/05/utah-letter-to-the-editor#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/utah">Utah</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">40258 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
