<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Supreme Court</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/558/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Clips Round-Up 6/9/10</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/06/09/clips-round-up-6-9-10</link>
 <description>The round-up of news clips from June 9, 2010.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/06/09/clips-round-up-6-9-10&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/06/09/clips-round-up-6-9-10#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/269">Arizona</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/california">california</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/lobbyists">lobbyists</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/maine">maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wall-street">Wall Street</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sam Greenberg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">135353 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who&#039;s really out of touch?</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/05/07/whos-really-out-of-touch</link>
 <description>This morning, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) takes to the opinion pages of the Washington Post, saying, &quot;the American people will want to know whether he is choosing someone who is committed to the text of the Constitution and the vision of the Founding Fathers, or whether his nominee is an activist.&quot;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/05/07/whos-really-out-of-touch&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/05/07/whos-really-out-of-touch#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/citizens-united">Citizens United</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/jeff-sessions">Jeff Sessions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">125252 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Congress&#039; Response to Citizens United Must Go Further</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/29/congress-response-to-citizens-united-must-go-further</link>
 <description>Public Campaign &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2010/04/29/congress-response-to-citizens-united-must-go-further&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;  to Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Chris Van Hollen&amp;#39;s introduction of their  legislative response to the &lt;em&gt;Citizens United&lt;/em&gt; U.S. Supreme Court  decision.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/29/congress-response-to-citizens-united-must-go-further&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/29/congress-response-to-citizens-united-must-go-further#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/citizens-united">Citizens United</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/disclose">DISCLOSE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Monica Rober</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">122859 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clips Round-Up 4/20</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/20/clips-round-up-4-20</link>
 <description>The round-up of news clips for April 20, 2010. &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/20/clips-round-up-4-20&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/20/clips-round-up-4-20#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/citizens-united">Citizens United</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew Alderman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">120122 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clips Round-Up 4/14</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/14/clips-round-up-4-14</link>
 <description>The round-up of news clips for April 14, 2010. 
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/14/clips-round-up-4-14&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/14/clips-round-up-4-14#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/citizens-united">Citizens United</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew Alderman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">118382 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bill May Up Profile of Political Sponsors</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/14/bill-may-up-profile-of-political-sponsors</link>
 <description>John Dimsdale with &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/04/14/am-bill-may-up-profile-political-sponsors/&quot;&gt;Marketplace  radio&lt;/a&gt; interviews Common Cause President Bob Edgar about Congress&amp;#39;  legislative response to the U.S. Supreme Court&amp;#39;s Citizens United ruling.  &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/14/bill-may-up-profile-of-political-sponsors&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/04/14/bill-may-up-profile-of-political-sponsors#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance-reform">campaign finance reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/citizens-united">Citizens United</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/common-cause">Common Cause</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Monica Rober</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">118328 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Polling Exposes Voter Anger</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/02/09/new-polling-exposes-voter-anger</link>
 <description>Citizens United ruling fuels voter ire: new bipartisan polling reveals  voters&amp;#39; anger with special interest influence in Washington. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32713.html&quot;&gt;Politico  reports&lt;/a&gt; that a whopping 79% of respondents think that Congress is  controlled by those who finance their campaigns.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/02/09/new-polling-exposes-voter-anger&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2010/02/09/new-polling-exposes-voter-anger#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/citizens-united">Citizens United</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/268">Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/fair-elections-now-act">Fair Elections Now Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/special-interests">special interests</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Monica Rober</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">100551 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wisconsin Supreme Court Elections Need Public Funding</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2009/04/10/wisconsin-supreme-court-elections-need-public-funding</link>
 <description>An editorial in The Post-Crescent asserts that it&#039;s time for judicial public financing in Wisconsin.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2009/04/10/wisconsin-supreme-court-elections-need-public-funding&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2009/04/10/wisconsin-supreme-court-elections-need-public-funding#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/disclosure">disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Monica Rober</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">49923 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>State Supreme Court Candidates Spending Millions</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/10/10/state-supreme-court-candidates-spending-millions</link>
 <description>Spending on TV ads reaches nearly $8 million this election cycle as top court candidates seek to reach voters. &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/10/10/state-supreme-court-candidates-spending-millions&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/10/10/state-supreme-court-candidates-spending-millions#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/advertising">advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/brennan-center-for-justice">Brennan Center for Justice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/justice-at-stake">Justice at Stake</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/louisiana">Louisiana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Burney Simpson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47356 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who&#039;s Looking Out for the Little Guys?</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/08/07/whos-looking-out-for-the-little-guys</link>
 <description>Adam Bonin, an election law expert, Philadelpia resident, and supporter of Clean Elections writes in the &lt;em&gt;Philadelphia Inquirer&lt;/em&gt; about the iniquities our big donor-dependent campaign finance system creates and how the recent spate of rulings by the Supreme Court are short-sighted and threaten valuable laws that curtail big money&amp;#39;s influence &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/08/07/whos-looking-out-for-the-little-guys&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/08/07/whos-looking-out-for-the-little-guys#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46108 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
