<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Alabama</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/482/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Father Knows Best</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/19/father-knows-best</link>
 <description>The &lt;em&gt;Montgomery Advertiser &lt;/em&gt;has a feature that&amp;#39;s sort of a point/counterpoint between family members.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080319/OPINION0101/803180341/1012/OPINION&quot;&gt;Today&amp;#39;s edition is a debate on public financing &lt;/a&gt;of elections between Mel Cooper Sr., retired executive director of the Alabama Ethics Commission and his son, Mel Cooper Jr., president of an online consulting firm.  No offense to Jr. on this one, but we have to agree with Dad.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/19/father-knows-best&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/19/father-knows-best#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/alabama">Alabama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43541 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alabama and New York Weigh Judicial Public Financing</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/11/06/alabama-and-new-york-weigh-judicial-public-financing</link>
 <description>One place where the public financing solution is seeing increased traction is in regards to judicial races, where the conflict between accepting campaign contributions and maintaining judicial impartiality is all the more clear. North Carolina has adopted it, Washington is thinking about it, and now legislators and citizen groups in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.al.com/opinion/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1162721744157310.xml&amp;amp;coll=2&quot;&gt;Alabama&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.northcountrygazette.org/articles/110506JudicialHearings.html&quot;&gt;New York &lt;/a&gt;are weighing the option. &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/11/06/alabama-and-new-york-weigh-judicial-public-financing&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/11/06/alabama-and-new-york-weigh-judicial-public-financing#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/alabama">Alabama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/new-york">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35719 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
