<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Wisconsin</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/474/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>For or Against</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against</link>
 <description>Next Tuesday Wisconsin voters will be voting on a new state Supreme Court justice and in&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hudsonstarobserver.com/articles/index.cfm?id=28417&amp;amp;section=homepage&amp;amp;freebie_check&amp;amp;CFID=20018254&amp;amp;CFTOKEN=88369360&amp;amp;jsessionid=88307b03926a236f3878&quot;&gt; this article for the &lt;em&gt;Hudson Star-Observer&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;the two candidates for the position present their platforms on a couple of subjects, including the way in which campaigns for the Wisconsin court are financed.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:24:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43615 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unlikely Alliance</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/11/unlikely-alliance</link>
 <description>Christine Bremmer Muggli of the Wisconsin Association for Justice (a trial lawyers group)&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080311/WDH06/803110340/1646/WDHopinion&quot;&gt; writes in favor of the Impartial Justice bill&lt;/a&gt; currently sitting in the state Assembly that would let candidates for the state Supreme Court run for office using public financing (similar to programs in North Carolina and New Mexico) and help control the spending, and partisanship, of judicial elections.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/11/unlikely-alliance&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/11/unlikely-alliance#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:34:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43450 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pass Wisconsin Judicial Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/28/pass-wisconsin-judicial-bill</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;The Daily Cardinal,&lt;/em&gt; the student paper for the University of Wisconsin at Madison&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailycardinal.com/article/2154&quot;&gt; lends its support&lt;/a&gt; to efforts to win full public financing for Wisconsin Supreme Court campaigns.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/28/pass-wisconsin-judicial-bill&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/28/pass-wisconsin-judicial-bill#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:45:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43300 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Leaning Towards Support</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/25/leaning-towards-support</link>
 <description>The&lt;em&gt; Sheboygan Press &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sheboygan-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080224/SHE06/802240364/1109/SHEopinion&quot;&gt;rebuffs state Senator Joe Liebham&lt;/a&gt; for failing to support a bill passed last week in the Senate to offer a full public financing option for candidates for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.  The paper notes that the program enjoys strong public support. The bill passed the Senate on a vote of 23-10 and will now be considered by the Assembly.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/25/leaning-towards-support&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/25/leaning-towards-support#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:33:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43200 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wisconsin Senate Passes Judicial Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/19/wisconsin-senate-passes-judicial-bill</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhinelanderdailynews.com/articles/2008/02/19/ap-state-wi/d8utj04g0.txt&quot;&gt;Cool!&lt;/a&gt;  The Wisconsin Senate just passed a bill on a vote of 21-10 to create a full public financing program for state Supreme Court races, like the systems in North Carolina and New Mexico.  The bill now moves to the state Assembly.   &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/19/wisconsin-senate-passes-judicial-bill&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/19/wisconsin-senate-passes-judicial-bill#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:42:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43072 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AARP Is In</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/06/aarp-is-in</link>
 <description>Joining the growing&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/column/271043&quot;&gt; coalition of groups endorsing&lt;/a&gt; full public financing of Wisconsin Supreme Court races are AARP Wisconsin and the Coalition of Wisconsin Aging Groups, who have come out in favor of the Senate bill to offer a Clean Elections-style option to judicial candidates on the model of programs in North Carolina and New Mexico. &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/06/aarp-is-in&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/06/aarp-is-in#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:10:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42790 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Appoint or Elect</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/04/appoint-or-elect</link>
 <description>Jack R. DeWitt, an attorney in Madison, Wisconsin penned this letter to the editor of the Capital Times arguing against the appointment of judges, but for&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/letters/270696&quot;&gt; public financing of judicial races&lt;/a&gt;, to protect against candidates having to compromise their future performance on the bench just to win their race. Often the question of what do about increasingly partisan and expensive judicial races comes down to appointment vs. public financing.  This is an interesting treatment of those two choices.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/04/appoint-or-elect&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/04/appoint-or-elect#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:09:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42762 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Come On, Governor</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/29/come-on-governor</link>
 <description>Oh how the mighty stall.  Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle (D) came out of the box strong last year on passing a full public financing program for judicial races, even calling a special session to consider that bill and a number of other campaign finance issues.  However it would appear &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailycardinal.com/article/1700&quot;&gt;the wind has rather gone out of the sails.&lt;/a&gt;  Though the Governor is still in support of public financing he&amp;#39;s not putting his full weight behind it.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/29/come-on-governor&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/29/come-on-governor#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:19:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42675 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Small Steps</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/22/small-steps</link>
 <description>Wisconsin has been moving closer to a public financing program for its judicial races and there&amp;#39;s been talk of passing a similar system for legislative races.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=709549&quot;&gt;This editorial&lt;/a&gt; in the&lt;em&gt; Milwaukee Journal Sentinel&lt;/em&gt; says that public financing should be the ultimate goal, but there are intermediate steps to take in the meantime since public financing will be a &amp;quot;huge hurdle&amp;quot; for the legislature to clear.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/22/small-steps&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/22/small-steps#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:29:42 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42594 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On Wisconsin Radio</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/on-wisconsin-radio</link>
 <description>Talk of campaign finance issues and proposals for full public financing of elections on WRN, the &lt;em&gt;Wisconsin Radio Network &lt;/em&gt;last night.  The story from Bob Hague and audio of the program is available &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wrn.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=7FCFE09C-CD0E-0C22-D52EB594CC0B117D&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/on-wisconsin-radio&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/on-wisconsin-radio#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:47:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42532 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
