<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - judicial public financing</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/459/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Court Rules for Public Financing</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/02/court-rules-for-public-financing</link>
 <description>The generally conservative 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected challenges to North Carolina&amp;#39;s full public financing program for judicial elections and&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/2823267/&quot;&gt; upheld the law &lt;/a&gt;that put Clean Elections-style financing of judicial races on the map.  This is great news for North Carolina and the popular public financing program, which this year has been expanded to include three Council of State positions (the state Cabinet).&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/02/court-rules-for-public-financing&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/02/court-rules-for-public-financing#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:40:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44242 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>For or Against</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against</link>
 <description>Next Tuesday Wisconsin voters will be voting on a new state Supreme Court justice and in&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hudsonstarobserver.com/articles/index.cfm?id=28417&amp;amp;section=homepage&amp;amp;freebie_check&amp;amp;CFID=20018254&amp;amp;CFTOKEN=88369360&amp;amp;jsessionid=88307b03926a236f3878&quot;&gt; this article for the &lt;em&gt;Hudson Star-Observer&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;the two candidates for the position present their platforms on a couple of subjects, including the way in which campaigns for the Wisconsin court are financed.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:24:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43615 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unlikely Alliance</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/11/unlikely-alliance</link>
 <description>Christine Bremmer Muggli of the Wisconsin Association for Justice (a trial lawyers group)&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080311/WDH06/803110340/1646/WDHopinion&quot;&gt; writes in favor of the Impartial Justice bill&lt;/a&gt; currently sitting in the state Assembly that would let candidates for the state Supreme Court run for office using public financing (similar to programs in North Carolina and New Mexico) and help control the spending, and partisanship, of judicial elections.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/11/unlikely-alliance&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/11/unlikely-alliance#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:34:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43450 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mitts Off The Money</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/10/mitts-off-the-money</link>
 <description>Public financing is contagious!  Michigan&amp;#39;s gone and caught it from Wisconsin and now a group in Michigan&amp;#39;s legislature is pushing for full public financing of state Supreme Court races even as Wisconsin battles to pass a similar bill through their Assembly. &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/10/mitts-off-the-money&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/10/mitts-off-the-money#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/michigan">Michigan</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43440 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On Second Thought...</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/06/on-second-thought</link>
 <description>The West Virginia judge who raised eyebrows for vacationing with the CEO of an energy company he&amp;#39;d just decided in favor of (a CEO known for using campaign contributions to influence the outcome of judicial races) has indicated he would support public financing of judicial races,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/506709.html&quot;&gt; but he has some concerns.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/06/on-second-thought&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/06/on-second-thought#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/west-viginia">West Viginia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:32:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43388 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pass Wisconsin Judicial Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/28/pass-wisconsin-judicial-bill</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;The Daily Cardinal,&lt;/em&gt; the student paper for the University of Wisconsin at Madison&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailycardinal.com/article/2154&quot;&gt; lends its support&lt;/a&gt; to efforts to win full public financing for Wisconsin Supreme Court campaigns.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/28/pass-wisconsin-judicial-bill&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/28/pass-wisconsin-judicial-bill#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:45:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43300 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Leaning Towards Support</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/25/leaning-towards-support</link>
 <description>The&lt;em&gt; Sheboygan Press &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sheboygan-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080224/SHE06/802240364/1109/SHEopinion&quot;&gt;rebuffs state Senator Joe Liebham&lt;/a&gt; for failing to support a bill passed last week in the Senate to offer a full public financing option for candidates for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.  The paper notes that the program enjoys strong public support. The bill passed the Senate on a vote of 23-10 and will now be considered by the Assembly.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/25/leaning-towards-support&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/25/leaning-towards-support#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:33:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43200 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wisconsin Senate Passes Judicial Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/19/wisconsin-senate-passes-judicial-bill</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rhinelanderdailynews.com/articles/2008/02/19/ap-state-wi/d8utj04g0.txt&quot;&gt;Cool!&lt;/a&gt;  The Wisconsin Senate just passed a bill on a vote of 21-10 to create a full public financing program for state Supreme Court races, like the systems in North Carolina and New Mexico.  The bill now moves to the state Assembly.   &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/19/wisconsin-senate-passes-judicial-bill&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/19/wisconsin-senate-passes-judicial-bill#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:42:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43072 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cleaning Up the Mitten</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/15/cleaning-up-the-mitten</link>
 <description>A group called the Michigan Campaign Finance Network is pressuring lawmakers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080215/POLITICS/802150374/1022/POLITICS&quot;&gt;to take up a bill that would create a full public financing program&lt;/a&gt; for candidates for the Michigan Supreme Court.  The increasing expense of nasty ad wars between candidates has raised concerns about judicial impartiality, and the conflict of interest created by donors later being involved in cases before the court.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/15/cleaning-up-the-mitten&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/15/cleaning-up-the-mitten#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/michigan">Michigan</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:59:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42946 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>AARP Is In</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/06/aarp-is-in</link>
 <description>Joining the growing&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/column/271043&quot;&gt; coalition of groups endorsing&lt;/a&gt; full public financing of Wisconsin Supreme Court races are AARP Wisconsin and the Coalition of Wisconsin Aging Groups, who have come out in favor of the Senate bill to offer a Clean Elections-style option to judicial candidates on the model of programs in North Carolina and New Mexico. &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/06/aarp-is-in&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/06/aarp-is-in#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/wisconsin">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:10:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42790 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
