<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - north carolina</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/316/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Public Financing Going to the Chapel?</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/15/public-financing-going-to-the-chapel</link>
 <description>Speaking of North Carolina, Chapel Hill may become the state&amp;#39;s first municipality to offer a full public financing option &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A258066&quot;&gt;for city council races.&lt;/a&gt;  The state legislature has approved the idea, now the council is debating it.  Cities like Portland, Oregon and Albuquerque, New Mexico offer a full public financing option and officials in more cities (like Los Angeles and New York) are proposing similar programs as the cost of running for office goes up and closes more people out.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/15/public-financing-going-to-the-chapel&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/15/public-financing-going-to-the-chapel#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/chapel-hill">Chapel Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:44:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44391 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Get Real</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/15/get-real</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/editorials/story/1071661.html&quot;&gt;From the &lt;em&gt;Raleigh News and Observer&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;this morning an editorial lauding the state&amp;#39;s existing public financing programs for campaigns in the state and encouraging further expansion of these programs as fast as possible.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/15/get-real&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/15/get-real#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:29:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44388 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Court Rules for Public Financing</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/02/court-rules-for-public-financing</link>
 <description>The generally conservative 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected challenges to North Carolina&amp;#39;s full public financing program for judicial elections and&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/2823267/&quot;&gt; upheld the law &lt;/a&gt;that put Clean Elections-style financing of judicial races on the map.  This is great news for North Carolina and the popular public financing program, which this year has been expanded to include three Council of State positions (the state Cabinet).&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/02/court-rules-for-public-financing&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/02/court-rules-for-public-financing#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:40:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44242 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chapel Hill Hearings</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/14/chapel-hill-hearings</link>
 <description>Hearings on a new full public financing program for elections in Chapel Hill, North Carolina &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.www.dailytarheel.com/media/storage/paper885/news/2008/04/14/City/Council.To.See.Election.Plan-3322487.shtml&quot;&gt;are getting underway&lt;/a&gt; after a long effort by town council member Mark Kleinschmidt to get attention to the issue.  The North Carolina Assembly has opened the door for Chapel Hill to pursue this on a pilot basis, we&amp;#39;ll see if it goes all the way.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/14/chapel-hill-hearings&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/14/chapel-hill-hearings#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/chapel-hill">Chapel Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43958 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Way to Run</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/10/new-way-to-run</link>
 <description>North Carolina&amp;#39;s&lt;em&gt; Independent Weekly&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A238920&quot;&gt; c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A238920&quot;&gt;overs the full public financing&lt;/a&gt; pilot program that applies to three Council of State races this year, and talks to candidates about how their run with public funding will diverge from the traditional campaign model.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/10/new-way-to-run&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/10/new-way-to-run#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/council-of-state">Council of State</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:09:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43851 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Going to Greensboro?</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/01/going-to-greensboro</link>
 <description>A group of Clean Elections supporters in Greensboro, North Carolina are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080401/NRSTAFF/749515474&quot;&gt;organizing to bring full public financing of elections&lt;/a&gt; to their city, following in the path of Albuquerque, New Mexico and Portland, Oregon, as well as public financing programs for North Carolina&amp;#39;s judicial races and three Council of State races, as well as a new program in the works for Chapel Hill.  As the cost of running for office escalates, there is concern that running for office is becoming prohibitively expensive for would-be candidates.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/01/going-to-greensboro&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/01/going-to-greensboro#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/249">Clean Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/greensboro">Greensboro</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:26:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43688 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Costing Out City Council</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/24/costing-out-city-council</link>
 <description>Joel Burgess at the &lt;em&gt;Asheville Citizen-Times &lt;/em&gt;writes about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080323/POLITICS01/80322063&quot;&gt;how expensive it&amp;#39;s getting&lt;/a&gt; to run for a City Council seat, and about the law recently passed in North Carolina allowing Chapel Hill to pursue a Clean Elections public financing option for its races to control costs and open the door for people without access to wealth to run for office.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/24/costing-out-city-council&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/24/costing-out-city-council#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/chapel-hil">Chapel Hil</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:04:40 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43588 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On Second Thought...</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/06/on-second-thought</link>
 <description>The West Virginia judge who raised eyebrows for vacationing with the CEO of an energy company he&amp;#39;d just decided in favor of (a CEO known for using campaign contributions to influence the outcome of judicial races) has indicated he would support public financing of judicial races,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/506709.html&quot;&gt; but he has some concerns.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/06/on-second-thought&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/06/on-second-thought#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/judicial-public-financing">judicial public financing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/west-viginia">West Viginia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:32:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43388 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looking Good</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/03/looking-good</link>
 <description>It looks as though participation in North Carolina&amp;#39;s pilot program for public financing of three Council of State races&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestate.com/local/story/333674.html&quot;&gt; will be high&lt;/a&gt;.  Six of the 11 candidates for the offices of auditor, insurance commissioner and superintendent of public instruction have indicated they would opt in, and another four are still mulling whether to participate.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/03/looking-good&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/03/looking-good#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/council-of-state">Council of State</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:17:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43350 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Snipping the Price Tag</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/30/snipping-the-price-tag</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;The Daily Tar Heel &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media.www.dailytarheel.com/media/storage/paper885/news/2007/11/30/Opinion/The-Price.Of.Power-3124948.shtml&quot;&gt;weighs in&lt;/a&gt; on recent efforts in Chapel Hill, North Carolina to implement a full public financing option for municipal races.  The price tag to win a seat in Chapel Hill is typically thousands of dollars -- well out of reach for many people who might otherwise make excellent candidates.  The editorial supports public financing to level the playing field for all competitors.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/30/snipping-the-price-tag&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/30/snipping-the-price-tag#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/chapel-hill">Chapel Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/north-carolina">north carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/261">Public Financing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:52:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">41882 at http://www.publicampaign.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
