<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Center for Competitive Politics - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/center-for-competitive-politics</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Center for Competitive Politics&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Francis Kramer</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-28051</link>
 <description>19no5a8xfpxuap8d
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On contested elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-27632</link>
 <description>Putting more money into the system actually makes elections more decisive. This argues against your fascist proposal. Why should it be difficult to weed out inferior and dishonest canidates. McCain has certainly benefited from his own legislation, because he would have been decisively defeated in the nomination process had he failed in campaign finance consolidations.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Here&#039;s A thought...</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-22281</link>
 <description>Is there any coincidence that all of our presidential candidates are independantly wealthy?  I guess that there are no qualified professors, CEO&#039;s, public servants (or other) whom are qualified to make decisions in a fashion on a par with say...President Bush?  Riiigghhtttt......</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The amplified voice of corporations in private funding</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-22218</link>
 <description>The present system of private financing of elections is like a meeting where the big money interests are represented by someone holding a bull horn turned up to its highest volume while the private citizen is represented by a single individual speaking in normal voice trying to counter the lies and distortions coming out of the bull horn.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
