<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - presidential - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/presidential</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;presidential&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Cleaner</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/16/candidate-donations-from-special-interests-up#comment-24714</link>
 <description>I agree as I do think that mandatory public financing would certainly make things a whole lot &quot;cleaner&quot;.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>clearing up the water</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/16/candidate-donations-from-special-interests-up#comment-24217</link>
 <description>I really love that Obama &quot;muddy water&quot; metaphor. I really think mandatory public financing would go a long way toward cleaning things up - along with full transparency. These interests want to spend money to influence so where will it go?  More ad campaigns?  
----
Support The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.melaleuca.org&quot;&gt;Melaleuca Foundation&lt;/a&gt; - Enhancing Lives, Restoring Hope.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
