<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - municipal public financing - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/municipal-public-financing</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;municipal public financing&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Clean  County Superior Court   Judges</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/03/08/clean-cities#comment-12643</link>
 <description>Would someone please quote me the Cal. State Law that according to my county Superior Court &quot;Stench from the Bench&quot; interpretation of an issue a statement (pursuant to Section 632 of the Code of Civil Procedure) is &quot;Because I said so&quot;.

           John Quincy, Recognized Commentator O.S.C.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
