<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Presidential public financing - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/presidential-public-financing</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Presidential public financing&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Very good design at this</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/07/10/look-no-farther#comment-28128</link>
 <description>Very good design at this website.
&lt;a href=http://sisterspharmacy.org/item/testosterone_booster_patch.html&gt;buy testosterone booster patch online&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>re: spelling error</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/08/system-for-the-future#comment-25014</link>
 <description>Noted and corrected - thanks.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>spelling error</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/08/system-for-the-future#comment-24962</link>
 <description>I appreciate this entry, but you spelled &quot;principal&quot; wrong. This will tend to diminish its impact. Keep up the good work. </description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>clean Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/12/13/over-7-000-sign-letter-to-fec#comment-22410</link>
 <description>There should be public financing of national &amp; other elections. this would be more fair.</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Banning private financing</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/08/28/lifelong-advocate#comment-21523</link>
 <description>Court rulings on campaign finance questions -- most prominently the Supreme Court opinion in Buckley v. Valeo -- suggest that efforts to ban all private campaign financing, even if passed into law, would meet extensive legal challenges and eventually be overturned.  The reason Clean Elections laws have held up to court challenge (and the argument that the giving a campaign contribution is analogous to exercising one&#039;s freedom of speech) is that participating in the program is entirely voluntary.  </description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Campaign Financing</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/08/28/lifelong-advocate#comment-21481</link>
 <description>Has anyone devised a plan to remove ALL private campaign financing? I would like to see a complete abolition of these funds in favor of complete government financing.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Presidential Candidates:</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/03/05/and-then-there-were-two#comment-12644</link>
 <description>Which runner would you think best stand to the Doctrine stressed in the &quot;Declaration of Independance&quot;.  Beware of the new breed of future leaders, Chancelors like in V- for Vendetta.

             John Quincy, Recognized Commentator, O.S.C.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
