<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - New York - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/new-york</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New York&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/06/16/views-from-all-over#comment-26153</link>
 <description>If you are interested in public financing of political campaigns, I encourage you to read my article titled &quot;REAL CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM&quot;, which was printed on OpEdNews.com on May 2, 2008.  In this article, I suggest a source of revenue for public financing of political campaigns that also reduces the undue influence of large donors. </description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:01:06 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think the black man should win the election.</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/23/in-new-york#comment-24832</link>
 <description>I think the Barack obama should win the election because he is the right leader for this great land. And I think he can do a good job. Good luck Barack</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:08:58 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Clean Elections&quot; a WINNER</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/01/flooding-the-market#comment-23690</link>
 <description>Ask the states that have it. I live in Maine and the difference is dramatic. The tone of campaigns has changed, &quot;unwholesome influences&quot; are being squeezed out, and campaign rhetoric is more issue based. Haven&#039;t seen evaluations yet, but I&#039;d bet that our legislative process is improving and will continue to improve steadily. Nobody here would want to go back to the old mode.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:46:18 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fair and Clean Campaigns</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/09/10/upcoming-event-in-new-york#comment-21941</link>
 <description>I have been supporting fair and clean elections by contributing to candidates who support the issue in which I believe. Democratic candidates like Barack Obama, and now John Edwards are accepting contributions from the public and not special interests. I like Hilary Clinton as well, but she does appear to be a business as usual candidate by beginning her campaign raising a large sum froming special interest contributors. We the people have to take our government back from lobbyist representing large corporation, who are working for the their stock holders and the bottom line, not always in the public interst..</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:20:50 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pennsylvania Clean Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/06/21/letter-urges-clean-elections-for-new-york#comment-17059</link>
 <description>Hi Katie,

I am interested in learning more about clean elections. I am starting an organization and I would like to make clean elections a vital component of the organization. If you could contact me and let me know how I could go about getting more information or training on the process I would appreciate it. Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you.

Wayne 
Pennsylvania Resident
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:17:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Just 6 dollars</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/08/04/the-big-loophole#comment-2151</link>
 <description>I have run into another outfit called just6rodollars that seems to be working on public campaign financing at the national level.  They seem to be very responsive.  What do you know about them?

Cordially,

Stair</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:14:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
