<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - maine - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog-tags/maine</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;maine&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>BOSTON MAINE CUTS LOSS. Net</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/02/maine-cuts#comment-28098</link>
 <description>BOSTON MAINE CUTS LOSS. Net Is $7348086 for 1921, Against $17132481 for 1920. The report of the Boston Maine Railroad for the year ended December.

-----------------------------------------

Edwina


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addictionlink.org/drug-rehab-center/maine&quot;&gt;maine drug rehab&lt;/a&gt; </description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Francis Kramer</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-28051</link>
 <description>19no5a8xfpxuap8d
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On contested elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-27632</link>
 <description>Putting more money into the system actually makes elections more decisive. This argues against your fascist proposal. Why should it be difficult to weed out inferior and dishonest canidates. McCain has certainly benefited from his own legislation, because he would have been decisively defeated in the nomination process had he failed in campaign finance consolidations.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Here&#039;s A thought...</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-22281</link>
 <description>Is there any coincidence that all of our presidential candidates are independantly wealthy?  I guess that there are no qualified professors, CEO&#039;s, public servants (or other) whom are qualified to make decisions in a fashion on a par with say...President Bush?  Riiigghhtttt......</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The amplified voice of corporations in private funding</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-22218</link>
 <description>The present system of private financing of elections is like a meeting where the big money interests are represented by someone holding a bull horn turned up to its highest volume while the private citizen is represented by a single individual speaking in normal voice trying to counter the lies and distortions coming out of the bull horn.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>HI, do you have ny updates</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/08/29/cleaning-up-health-care#comment-14402</link>
 <description>HI, do you have ny updates on this?</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Breaking news..</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/10/19/and-now-for-clean-elections#comment-4949</link>
 <description>It was great to see the presentation on NOW about campaign finance reform.  There must be a huge number of American people on the verge of hearing about viability of this reform and potentially waking up to the benefits.
The pendulum has run the other way, away from populist democracy, for the past 25 years, and now there is momentum for a swing.
These people-driven movements have been among the most powerful political engines in American history.  What can be more important at this time for Americans to do than work on the quality of their own democracy?</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
