<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Clean Elections - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/taxonomy/term/249</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Clean Elections&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>America</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/10/01/victory-in-california#comment-27642</link>
 <description>Lets go back to an honest decent America right now!!</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On contested elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/ccp_rebuttal#comment-27632</link>
 <description>Putting more money into the system actually makes elections more decisive. This argues against your fascist proposal. Why should it be difficult to weed out inferior and dishonest canidates. McCain has certainly benefited from his own legislation, because he would have been decisively defeated in the nomination process had he failed in campaign finance consolidations.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mike Becker is the Voter</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/10/01/props-to-arizona#comment-27620</link>
 <description>Mike Becker is the Voter Education Manager for the Citizens Clean Elections Commission not the Clean Elections Institute.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks Adam!</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/09/21/youth-engagement#comment-27568</link>
 <description>Adam, thanks so much for your participation in this weekend&#039;s festivities - we&#039;re pumped to work with you again soon! </description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obama&#039;s Lie</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/06/18/bring-it-back-to-mass#comment-26174</link>
 <description>Obama just killed the credibility of public financing.  

Politicians will support it when it works to their favor, and abandon it when their own special interests dictate.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/06/16/views-from-all-over#comment-26153</link>
 <description>If you are interested in public financing of political campaigns, I encourage you to read my article titled &quot;REAL CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM&quot;, which was printed on OpEdNews.com on May 2, 2008.  In this article, I suggest a source of revenue for public financing of political campaigns that also reduces the undue influence of large donors. </description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Campaign Finance</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/15/show-me-clean-elections#comment-24992</link>
 <description>Like so many Missourians who believe in transparency in government, it is our hope SB1038(campaign contributions)will die this session. It keeps being moved on the calendar behind more important legislation and with one week remaining,perhaps it will be a dead issue.......this year.

</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think the black man should win the election.</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/23/in-new-york#comment-24832</link>
 <description>I think the Barack obama should win the election because he is the right leader for this great land. And I think he can do a good job. Good luck Barack</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clean elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/03/cutbacks#comment-24519</link>
 <description>Cutting funding for Florida&#039;s Elections is not the way to go to obtain clean and fair elections.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>when corporations give huge</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/07/28/crude-conflict-of-interest#comment-24482</link>
 <description>when corporations give huge &quot;donations&quot; to political candidates, that candidate is going to owe somebody something down the line... it&#039;s a broken system, but what are you gonna do?</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>limited terms</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/07/24/reform-in-tennessee#comment-24299</link>
 <description>Though I do not live in Tennessee I plan to move there soon.  I am &quot;just checking things out&quot; so to say.  What do you think of limited terms.  Don&#039;t leave them up there long enough to become corrupted.  </description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You&#039;re welcome</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/20/arizona-example#comment-24202</link>
 <description>Matt, 
No problem -- thanks for writing about this! Hope the information on our site was useful to you.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clean Elections throughout America</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/05/local-option-clears-legislature#comment-24156</link>
 <description>I take exception to the U S Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that MONEY is a form of FREE SPEECH.  Money has badly corrupted the entire election process.   Money must not be permitted to distort election results.  The Supreme Court&#039;s decision can be changed by congressional action and the sooner the better.
Cities and states all over America are deciding to take money out of politics by opting for Public Financing.  This movement must be encouraged until Clean Elections cover the map of America.  Such action will restore democracy to the people.
We must stop permitting our elected officials to be bought and owned by Special Interest Groups! </description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clean elections.</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/05/local-option-clears-legislature#comment-24143</link>
 <description>Clean election laws are a must in every state in the union and also on a federal level please support such laws.

Amazing Caso</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks for referencing my</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/02/20/arizona-example#comment-24142</link>
 <description>Thanks for referencing my aritle, Katie!

I just happened across this post and thought it was cool because I actually rummaged through this site a little bit while researching. I plan to touch on the subject again in future columns, so I&#039;ll keep you updated.

Sincerely,
Matt Styer</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
