<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Report Card - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/08/22/report-card</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Report Card&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Report Card</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/08/22/report-card</link>
 <description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cgs.org/&quot;&gt;Center for Governmental Studies&lt;/a&gt; has released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cgs.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=176:PUBLICATIONS&amp;amp;catid=39:all_pubs&amp;amp;Itemid=72&quot;&gt;a study of New Jersey&amp;#39;s Clean Elections pilot program&lt;/a&gt; and it is overwhelmingly positive.  While offering a few recommendations for improvement (chief among them expanding the system to primaries and making a better effort on behalf of third parties) the Center thinks the system should be expanded and &amp;quot;could be a state-wide success.&quot;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
