<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - New Jersey Consequences - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/07/03/new-jersey-consequences</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New Jersey Consequences&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Jersey Consequences</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/07/03/new-jersey-consequences</link>
 <description>The &lt;em&gt;Courier-Post&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080703/NEWS01/807030374/1006&quot;&gt;weighs in on&lt;/a&gt; what the ramifications of the Supreme Court ruling on the Millionaire&amp;#39;s Amendment might be for the New Jersey Clean Elections program.  Sen Bill Baroni (R), a fervent backer of Clean Elections, criticizes the decision that &amp;quot;certainly does nothing to advance the cause of  cleaning up politics.&amp;quot;  The 2007 cycle of the state&amp;#39;s Clean Elections program was very successful -- a good counterweight to any arguments for it being significantly altered.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
