<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - New Rules - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/20/new-rules</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New Rules&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Rules</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/05/20/new-rules</link>
 <description>On the campaign finance disclosure front a couple of states are looking to close some loopholes.  In California &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-gifts20-2008may20,0,5259059.story&quot;&gt;new ethics rules &lt;/a&gt;will require an explanation for luxury purchases made with campaign funds to ensure they&amp;#39;re necessary for the candidate to do his or her job. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_9317679&quot;&gt; Meanwhile, Utah&lt;/a&gt; is looking to clear up a worrying feature of their electronic campaign finance filing system that lets campaign edit and delete entries at will, with no record of it having been done.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
