<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Executive Summary - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/aotm/summary</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Executive Summary&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Executive Summary</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/aotm/summary</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a buzz in the air among those who follow politics about the increasing importance of small donors in elections. It’s true that in some races in some places, small donors are contributing at greater levels than they have previously. This can only help engage more people in politics. However, the larger story is that the great bulk of campaign contributions still come from big donors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
