<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - New Deal - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/14/new-deal</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New Deal&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Deal</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/14/new-deal</link>
 <description>Connecticut&amp;#39;s&lt;em&gt; Record Journal &lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myrecordjournal.com/site/tab1.cfm?newsid=19479143&amp;amp;BRD=2755&amp;amp;PAG=461&amp;amp;dept_id=592708&amp;amp;rfi=6&quot;&gt;has a short note &lt;/a&gt;about the state&amp;#39;s brand spankin&amp;#39; new Clean Elections program now that candidates for the state legislature are in the thick of qualifying to receive public funds to run their campaigns: &amp;quot;[f]ancy fundraising events and ad books are campaign fundraising tactics of the past.&amp;quot;  And that&amp;#39;s a good thing.  Connecticut expects very high participation rates among incumbents and challenger in the public financing program.</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
