<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Going to Greensboro? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/01/going-to-greensboro</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Going to Greensboro?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Going to Greensboro?</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/04/01/going-to-greensboro</link>
 <description>A group of Clean Elections supporters in Greensboro, North Carolina are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080401/NRSTAFF/749515474&quot;&gt;organizing to bring full public financing of elections&lt;/a&gt; to their city, following in the path of Albuquerque, New Mexico and Portland, Oregon, as well as public financing programs for North Carolina&amp;#39;s judicial races and three Council of State races, as well as a new program in the works for Chapel Hill.  As the cost of running for office escalates, there is concern that running for office is becoming prohibitively expensive for would-be candidates.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:26:45 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
