<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - For or Against - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;For or Against&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>For or Against</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/03/27/for-or-against</link>
 <description>Next Tuesday Wisconsin voters will be voting on a new state Supreme Court justice and in&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hudsonstarobserver.com/articles/index.cfm?id=28417&amp;amp;section=homepage&amp;amp;freebie_check&amp;amp;CFID=20018254&amp;amp;CFTOKEN=88369360&amp;amp;jsessionid=88307b03926a236f3878&quot;&gt; this article for the &lt;em&gt;Hudson Star-Observer&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;the two candidates for the position present their platforms on a couple of subjects, including the way in which campaigns for the Wisconsin court are financed.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:24:54 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
