<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - My Oh Monaco - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/my-oh-monaco</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;My Oh Monaco&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Not politically correct, just real</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/my-oh-monaco#comment-23354</link>
 <description>For one thing, I am far from a politician. &quot;Special influence&quot; is perfectly legal the way things are set up now. Unless you have plenty of your own money to campaign, you&#039;ve got to take someone else&#039;s. That doesn&#039;t necessarily mean you are corrupt.  But you&#039;re bound to be at least &quot;aware&quot; of who gave you money, and you probably take their phone calls. When was the last time someone gave you a couple of thousand dollars just for nothing?  We need a system where legislators can run without taking anyone&#039;s money. Then even the good guys will have no possibility of the appearance of being influenced, and the bad guys will have a harder time being corrupt.</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I can&#039;t stand political correctness.</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/my-oh-monaco#comment-23331</link>
 <description>It really p***es me off!!
Why do politicians wimp out and use the phrase &quot;special interests influence&quot; when what they should say is &quot;corruption&quot; as in...
&quot;I think one of the key parts of our work is trying to eliminate special interest influence from our elections at all levels,&quot; she said.
This, of course, should read, &quot;I think one of the key parts of our work is trying to eliminate corruption in our elections at all levels&quot;.
Which do you think is a more truthful statement?</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wow</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/my-oh-monaco#comment-23324</link>
 <description>Unfortunately the court will probably seal most of the evidence here and I doubt anyone will be held accountable.  I knew I shoulda been a corrupt lawyer.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>hahaha :D busted :) goes to</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/my-oh-monaco#comment-23312</link>
 <description>hahaha :D busted :) goes to show u cant get away with it forever and more than likely someone will have pictures ;)</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My Oh Monaco</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/16/my-oh-monaco</link>
 <description>A West Virginia judge decides in a coal company&amp;#39;s favor and then photos surface of that judge on vacation in Monaco with the company&amp;#39;s CEO...nothing fishy about that arrangement &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.herald-dispatch.com/elections/x1619683909&quot;&gt;at all.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
