<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Clean for Coming Years - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/07/clean-for-coming-years</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Clean for Coming Years&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Clean for Coming Years</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2008/01/07/clean-for-coming-years</link>
 <description>The&lt;em&gt; Asbury Park Press&lt;/em&gt; says New Jersey should &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080107/OPINION01/801070315/1029/OPINION&quot;&gt;keep its Clean Elections &lt;/a&gt;pilot program and expand it for the next cycle.  Citing polling that shows voters in Clean Elections districts felt campaigns this year were more issue-focused, and the high rate of participation in the districts the paper sees a long-term place for Clean Elections in state elections, with a small caveat on the subject of cost.</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
