<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Pass It, Make It Permanent - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/12/28/pass-it-make-it-permanent</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pass It, Make It Permanent&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Pass It, Make It Permanent</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/12/28/pass-it-make-it-permanent</link>
 <description>The day after Christmas is a day to think about changing how we finance elections, or so two items from Washington and New Jersey would suggest.  Kathy DeNeui &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20071226/OPINION02/546300530&quot;&gt;wants to see Clean Elections pass in Washington&lt;/a&gt;, while the &lt;em&gt;Courier Post&lt;/em&gt; wants the Clean Elections pilot program in New Jersey&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071226/OPINION/712260304/1046&quot;&gt; to become a permanent part of state elections.&lt;/a&gt; Sounds like the makings of a few New Year&amp;#39;s resolutions for state legislatures!</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
