<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Two For, None Against - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/12/18/two-for-none-against</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Two For, None Against&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Two For, None Against</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/12/18/two-for-none-against</link>
 <description>USA Today has &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/12/how-about-publi.html#more&quot;&gt;two letters &lt;/a&gt;today responding to their editorial last week in support of full public financing of campaigns, and the companion editorial against public financing &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2007/12/11/countering-ctr-for-competitive-politics-fact-distortion&quot;&gt;written by the Center for Competitive Politics&lt;/a&gt;. One letter-writer supports public financing of campaigns, the other, our President and CEO Nick Nyhart, wants to set the record straight about arguments made against Clean Elections.</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
