<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Next Step for Chapel Hill - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/26/next-step-for-chapel-hill</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Next Step for Chapel Hill&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Next Step for Chapel Hill</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/26/next-step-for-chapel-hill</link>
 <description>Chapel Hill, North Carolina may have a public financing program for municipal elections&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsobserver.com/news/orange/story/792784.html&quot;&gt; if the town council signs off on it. &lt;/a&gt; The state Assembly has already approved the program.  Supporters hope that a public financing option will even out the playing field for challengers to compete against established incumbents.</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
