<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Taking a Special Interest - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/05/taking-a-special-interest</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Taking a Special Interest&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Taking a Special Interest</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/11/05/taking-a-special-interest</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt; has consistently supported public financing of elections, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/11/our-view-on-fil.html#more&quot;&gt;in this article &lt;/a&gt;which critiques the influence of special interest money in judicial elections, the paper praises efforts to offer a full public financing option for judicial races.</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
