<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - New Regulations Proposed for Maine Clean Elections - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/09/05/new-regulations-proposed-for-maine-clean-elections</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New Regulations Proposed for Maine Clean Elections&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Regulations Proposed for Maine Clean Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/09/05/new-regulations-proposed-for-maine-clean-elections</link>
 <description>Some Maine legislators are preparing to introduce a bill that would ban Clean Elections candidates &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.keepmecurrent.com/Government/story.cfm?storyID=42393&quot;&gt;from paying family members for campaign-related work&lt;/a&gt; with public funds.  The Maine Ethics Commission voted against such a proposal, favoring a full disclosure provision instead.  This bill is in reaction to gubernatorial candidate Barbara Merrill&amp;#39;s decision in the 2006 election to pay her husband $109,000 for work he did on her campaign.</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:57:33 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
