<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Missing the Mark - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/08/22/missing-the-mark</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Missing the Mark&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Missing the Mark</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2007/08/22/missing-the-mark</link>
 <description>&lt;em&gt;The Columbian&lt;/em&gt; in Washington &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.columbian.com/opinion/news/08222007news186976.cfm&quot;&gt;argues that&lt;/a&gt; public financing of elections isn&amp;#39;t necessary -- all we need is better disclosure of contributions to campaigns.  While the push for better disclosure requirements is well taken, the editorial misses some important points about the benefits of public financing.</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
