<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Wisconsin and Disclosure - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/12/18/wisconsin-and-disclosure</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Wisconsin and Disclosure&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Wisconsin and Disclosure</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/12/18/wisconsin-and-disclosure</link>
 <description>Following this most recent round of elections, Wisconsin is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madison.com/wsj/mad/top/index.php?ntid=111548&amp;amp;ntpid=1&quot;&gt;considering stricter disclosure laws&lt;/a&gt; for certain issue ad expenditures - those not tied to a particular candidate or committee, but which mention a candidate&amp;#39;s name in connection with an issue.  There are further reform plans afoot to push for a public financing law.</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
