<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Colorado&#039;s Big Money Problem - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/08/21/colorados-big-money-problem</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Colorado&#039;s Big Money Problem&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Colorado&#039;s Big Money Problem</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/08/21/colorados-big-money-problem</link>
 <description>Our resident money in politics research expert, Nancy Watzman, wrote &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2006/08/15/big-contributions-rule&quot;&gt;earlier this month&lt;/a&gt; about a recent finding that big contributions still largely fuel campaigns, despite chatter about the &amp;quot;rise of the small donor.&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=453&quot;&gt;Here she shows&lt;/a&gt; the phenomenon at a more local level: Colorado&amp;#39;s gubernatorial contest. </description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
