<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="0.92" xml:base="http://www.publicampaign.org">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign - Public Financing for Louisiana - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/07/18/public-financing-for-louisiana</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Public Financing for Louisiana&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Clean elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/07/18/public-financing-for-louisiana#comment-23419</link>
 <description>To put it plainly, without public funding of the political process democracy simply doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Financing of Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/07/18/public-financing-for-louisiana#comment-2150</link>
 <description>Thanks for your generous comments.  Let&#039;s stick to the goal of getting this accomplished in Louisiana.  I see California is voting on the same thing as Proposition 89.

I&#039;ll have to get a copy of Prop 89 to see how it reads.</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Financing for Louisiana</title>
 <link>http://www.publicampaign.org/blog/2006/07/18/public-financing-for-louisiana</link>
 <description>Ray Schell, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/3369571.html&quot;&gt;writing&lt;/a&gt; in&lt;em&gt; The Advocate&lt;/em&gt;, says Louisiana must have public financing of elections in the model of Arizona: &amp;quot;People say that we cannot afford to have public financing of elections. I say we cannot afford not to.&amp;quot;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
