|
The Work of Clean Elections: Interview with Adam Sotak Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Wed, 03/07/2007 - 4:22pm.
Posted in: Activist | Clean Elections | Democracy North Carolina | north carolina | Profile | Public Financing
Yesterday I had the opportunity to talk with one of the organizers at the forefront of the work to win full public financing of elections in North Carolina. Organizing Director Adam Sotak has been with Democracy North Carolina since 2000, and talked with me about the history of the work in North Carolina, and what 2007 has in store.
I got my bachelor’s degree in social work in 1996. After that I went to work at wilderness camp for adjudicated boys, which satisfied my need to do something good in the world; and not be sitting a desk all day. Then I started to think about doing work that dealt with the bigger picture, a more “macro” way of changing communities. I completed my Masters in Social Work and got more involved in political reform and labor issues and did the AFL CIO Organizing Institute apprenticeship program, which meant heading to the DC area for several months to work with a parking workers union. After that, I came back to NC to pursue my long-standing interest in political reform and changing the system. A friend of mine was organizing with Democracy South, and I joined up in January of 2000. In 2003, Democracy North Carolina was formed as a spin-off from Democracy South.
Talk a little about what Democracy North Carolina does. Our mission is broad: to uphold the principle of one person; one vote. Clean Elections has been a major part of our work, as has our research work, directed by Bob Hall. We organize people around public financing, same day voter registration, instant run-off voting, ex-felon re-enfranchisement; get-out-the-vote activities, and general voter education.
Lots of states are now looking at public financing of judicial races – what role has NC played being an early adopter of the system? We’ve been a leader in that sense. Numbers don’t lie: if you look at the statistics from our judicial public financing program, people using it and it works smoothly. It’s a good program and now other states are looking at North Carolina and thinking it could work other places, like GA, IL,MI, MT, NM, OR, WI, WA, and NY. The next test is to see whether a win for judicial public financing can lead to a win for public financing of legislative races.
What tools/activities/strategies have proved most valuable for Democracy North Carolina in advancing this work? Reply |
ENewsletter Sign Up!
Voter Blog
Breaking the Logjam on Global Warming posted by Katie Schlieper on 09-05-2008 Jay Mandle, professor and member of Democracy Matters pens a monthly series called "Money on My Mind" that examines the campaign finance angle of current hot button issues. His latest piece, on global warming, follows. Published in: campaign contributions | environment Too Soon posted by Katie Schlieper on 09-04-2008 Several New Jersey papers weigh in on yesterday's comments by Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts that the Clean Elections pilot program in the state will be suspended for 2009. The overarching theme seems to be that while a few legitimate fixes to the program would be welcome, abandoning it entirely because of one court case in Arizona is wrong-headed and ultimately harmful to the voters of New Jersey. Published in: Clean Elections | New Jersey AB 583 Moves On posted by Katie Schlieper on 09-03-2008 More good news from California! The Clean Elections bill, AB 583, which would create a pilot program of full public financing for candidates for Secretary of State, has passed out of the state legislature after the Assembly approved the version of the bill passed late last week in the Senate. The bill now goes to the desk of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for his approval. Stay tuned... Published in: california | Clean Elections Creative Commons
|
powered by Drupal