|
Senators Dodd and Durbin Announce Push for Public Financing Submitted by Nancy Watzman on Thu, 02/09/2006 - 12:00am.
Yesterday Senators Chris Dodd (D-CT) and Richard Durbin (D-IL) announced that they will push for public financing of federal elections. Sen. Durbin is the second-ranking member of the Senate Democratic leadership. Dodd is the most senior Democratic member of the committee that oversees campaign finance regulation. Durbin told The Hill, a Capitol Hill newspaper, that he believes that campaign finance is at the core of the current Abramoff scandals. Dodd also told the newspaper that a major source of potential corruption exists in the “campaign fundraising area.” In response to the two senators’ announcement, Public Campaign executive director Nick Nyhart released a statement: “Senators Durbin and Dodd have the right idea. The only way to restore public trust in Congress is to deal with the root of the Abramoff, Cunningham and DeLay scandals, and that is campaign money. “At the heart of each of these scandals is a core problem: Our public representatives, the holders of our trust, need huge sums of money to finance their campaigns, and today’s campaign finance system puts the interests of elite donors ahead of the interests of the public. Influence peddlers like Jack Abramoff would have no power if elected officials didn’t feel compelled to offer them access and influence. “Senators Durbin and Dodd are talking about public financing of federal elections because they understand that influence-peddling will continue to plague Washington unless we offer candidates a ‘clean,’ disinterested source of public funding for their campaigns. “We urge all members of Congress to take a close look at the success of full public financing models—also known as “Clean Elections”—in the states of Arizona, Maine, North Carolina, and Vermont, which have inspired similar systems that are currently being implemented in the states of Connecticut, New Jersey, and New Mexico, as well as the cities of Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Portland, Oregon. “We anticipate a robust debate in Congress on the merits of public financing for federal elections, and we look forward to working with Members as they take on this vital issue.” Reply |
ENewsletter Sign Up!
Voter Blog
Meet Your Candidates posted by Katie Schlieper on 08-28-2008 This is an interesting story on the campaign strategies of three Republicans competing for a state House seat, two of whom are running with Clean Elections funds. Notice the story opens up with one candidate walking door to door to talk to voters -- there's Clean Elections for you! Published in: Arizona | Clean Elections Next Up, New York? posted by Katie Schlieper on 08-27-2008 Depending on how the state legislative elections results shake out in New York come November we could be looking at much improved odds for passing a Clean Elections bill there in the coming year. New York Governor David Paterson (D) is certainly a supporter of Clean Elections, if not the most outspoken on the subject, and state activists are keeping up the drumbeat for movement on legislation -- see this letter to the editor in Binghamton. Published in: Clean Elections | New York Not This Time posted by Katie Schlieper on 08-27-2008 I'm sorry to report that Alaska's Clean Elections ballot initiative did not pass yesterday -- in fact, on the primary ballot where both Sen. Ted Stevens (R) and Rep. Don Young (R) faced primary challenges none of the ballot initiatives got much love. But as they say, Rome wasn't built in a day. This is only the beginning of Alaska's fight for Clean Elections. Published in: Alaska | Clean Elections | Don Young | Ted Stevens Creative Commons
|
powered by Drupal