Public Campaign

Donate Now
Follow us On:
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Fair Facts
  • Get Involved
  • Voter Blog
  • Press Room
  • About Us

A Few Billion Among Friends

Submitted by Jiefei Yuan on Mon, 07/28/2008 - 14:50

A massive housing rescue package passed the Senate on Saturday after President Bush reluctantly dropped his opposition last week. The measure, which provides 300 billion dollars to help save 400,000 homeowners from foreclosure nationwide, is widely regarded as the single most important housing legislation in a generation. Upon closer examination, it appears Congress is actually tossing two lifelines – one to distressed homeowners and one to our best friends, Fannie and Freddie. The special status of Fannie and Freddie, both as government-sponsored agencies and shareholder-owned companies, entitles them to strong government backing – AKA taxpayer bailout – in case things turn sour. But records show our two buddies have long acted in the interest of shareholders, not stakeholders like you and me. The result: taxpayers bear the risk while shareholders enjoy the profits. Former Rep. Richard Baker (R-LA) revealed the pay schedule of Fannie Mae managers in 2004, noting that top officials at the company all made $1 million or more annually and that bonuses were paid out of $245 million over the course of 5 years. When Rep. Baker tried to push forward reforms, his efforts were unsurprisingly squashed by the entities’ powerful political allies. Just to give a glimpse of their political clout: in 2008 alone, Fannie has given more than $900,000 to candidates and political parties, while Freddie has splurged on gifts topping $475,000. Fannie and Freddie sure know how to make their views known when it counts. After their stocks took a nosedive last week, the government took immediate action to rescue them by adding an extra lifeline to the proposed housing bill. Officials warned that their failure would wreck havoc in the financial and housing markets. Probably true, but will Fannie and Freddie have learned the lesson after this debacle? The good news is the latest housing bill is intended to wring in the powers of the two mortgage giants; further government oversight is also expected. But the question remains as to how such regulation will be realized given Fannie and Freddie’s political clout on Capitol Hill.

  • campaign contributions
  • mortgage industry

Recent Blog Posts

Rep. Chellie Pingree: Recovering Democracy After Citizens United
February 9, 2012
In an op-ed today, Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) speaks out against the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision and advocates for the Fair Elections Now Act.Rep. Pingree, an original co-...

Clips Round-up 2/9/12
February 9, 2012
Hey, have you signed the petition on the White House website urging President Obama to appoint new FEC commissioners? We need about 1,500 more (by tomorrow!) to reach the 25,000 goal. Please help!...

PRESS RELEASE: Obama Must Provide Muscular Plan to Save Our Ailing Democracy
February 7, 2012
In a press release this morning, Public Campaign Action Fund argued that President Obama’s decision to green-light super PAC money in support of his re-election means that talk is no longer enough...

Clips Round-up for 2/7/12
February 7, 2012
Story of the day from the NYT: Obama yields in marshaling of "super PAC" "President Obama is signaling to wealthy Democratic donors that he wants them to start contributing to an outside group...

View All Blog Posts
  • Privacy Policy

Public Campaign

1133 19th Street, NW 9th Floor Washington, DC 20036
  • info@publicampaign.org
  • 202.640.5600
  • 202.640.5601