Public Campaign

Donate Now
Follow us On:
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Fair Facts
  • Get Involved
  • Voter Blog
  • Press Room
  • About Us

Views from All Over

Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Mon, 06/16/2008 - 19:01

Papers in New Jersey and Alaska are rallying behind Clean Elections, and the Albany Times-Union runs an op-ed urging New York Governor David Patterson and the state legislature to advance public financing of elections. Is it my birthday?Alaskans will vote on a Clean Elections ballot initiative in August and the Kodiak Daily Mirror says that with all the corruption the state has seen of late, it's something you need to vote for: "Clean Elections or Ballot Measure 3 is worth it. We need to work on a clean start, provide an alternative to the current process and establish a voluntary system of public funding."Meanwhile, New Jersey's Courier Post, which has a history of supporting Clean Elections progress in the state calls on the state legislature to fund the next round of the Clean Elections pilot program, which would cover more races, as well as primaries in the selected districts.A more lengthy argument in favor of public financing of elections comes in the Albany Times-Union courtesy of The Brennan Center's Andrew Stengal and Laura MacCleery. Like Spitzer before him, but perhaps more successfully, Paterson is shopping around a proposal that will close off some glaring contribution loopholes and impose new limit on certain kinds of contributions. It's a good start -- but there's more work to do: There was talk then that the public financing of campaigns would come next. Expectations should be no different this time around. The only meaningful way to address the influence of money in politics is by a system of public financing.Look no farther than Connecticut for an example of the accident waiting to happen here. A hive of political corruption was uncovered throughout the state when it came to light that, among other offenses, then-Gov. John Rowland accepted gifts such as a free hot tub and a state senator had a $30,000 no-show job. In reaction, Connecticut introduced a raft of reforms to reduce the influence of political insiders and wealthy special interest donors and created a voluntary system of public financing for candidates. That's exactly what New York needs.

  • Alaska
  • Clean Elections
  • New Jersey
  • New York

Recent Blog Posts

JPMorgan's PAC Donations - April 2012
May 18, 2012
Congressional hearings are likely to begin soon concerning the $3 billion JPMorgan Chase lost through risky trading practices. The bank, like most with an interest in Washington business, has a...

Senators Rewarded for Oil Subsidies Vote
May 18, 2012
On March 29th, the U.S. Senate failed to pass legislation to end billions of dollars in wasteful subsidies to oil companies. In the month after the vote, seven Senators were rewarded for their “no”...

Clips Round-up for 5/18/12
May 18, 2012
Campaign Finance/Fair Elections Roll Call: Coburn calls on parties to reject public funding for conventions "Opening a new front in the GOP’s ongoing bid to end public campaign financing, Sen. Tom...

Clips Round-up for 5/17/12
May 17, 2012
Campaign Finance/Fair Elections Will One of These Cases Be the Next Citizens United? Mother Jones provides an outlook on a number of campaign finance cases coming before the courts. 38 Organizations...

View All Blog Posts
  • Privacy Policy

Public Campaign

1133 19th Street, NW 9th Floor Washington, DC 20036
  • info@publicampaign.org
  • 202.640.5600
  • 202.640.5601