Weighing in on Fair Elections

Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Wed, 03/21/2007 - 2:09pm.

Lots of coverage on yesterday's introduction of the Fair Elections Now Act in the Senate, and its counterpart, the Clean Money Clean Elections Act, in the House. The Hill covers Senators Durbin and Specter's committment to bringing change to Capitol Hill, while our David Donnelly, and US PIRG's Gary Kalman write on Alternet about out of control campaign spending, and how the Fair Elections Now Act will work to control it.

 

Public Campaign's President and CEO, Nick Nyhart, also writes over at TPM Cafe about how the Fair Elections Now Act, the Clean Elections policy itself, will help to reinvigorate the work of campaign finance reform with a focus on grassroots energy for change, and greater citizen engagement overall in the political process.


1 comment
. . . . .

Under the FENA can candidates who want to qualify as "Fair Elections" candidates accept contributions from PACs or not? The below text from page one of publicampaign.org says no. But a breakdown on page two indicates that they WOULD be able to accept up to $100 from PACs. What's the deal?

Before declaring an intent to run and qualifying as a "Fair Elections" candidate, a U.S. Senate candidate may solicit, accept, and spend seed money contributions of up to $100 from individual contributors (but not from PACs or other special interests) living in any state.


Submitted by Clean Elections Friend (not verified) on Thu, 03/22/2007 - 10:48am.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.