Citizens United ruling fuels voter ire: new bipartisan polling reveals voters' anger with special interest influence in Washington. Politico reports that a whopping 79% of respondents think that Congress is controlled by those who finance their campaigns.

An editorial in The Post-Crescent asserts that it's time for judicial public financing in Wisconsin.

Spending on TV ads reaches nearly $8 million this election cycle as top court candidates seek to reach voters.

Adam Bonin, an election law expert, Philadelpia resident, and supporter of Clean Elections writes in the Philadelphia Inquirer about the iniquities our big donor-dependent campaign finance system creates and how the recent spate of rulings by the Supreme Court are short-sighted and threaten valuable laws that curtail big money's influence

Eliza Newlin Carney at the National Journal gets opinions from around the campaign finance reform community about what effect the recent Supreme Court rulings on political advertising and the Millionaire's Amendment will have on other types of campaign finance laws. While the general view is that it will have negative consequences for many types of regulatory laws, the news is not all bad for public financing programs.

Jeff Milchen of Reclaim Democracy attacks the foundations of both the Buckley v. Valeo decision, and the most recent ruling from the Supreme Court building on the Buckley precedent in this op-ed for the Baltimore Sun that makes a compelling argument about the dangers of protecting money's "speech" role in elections ahead of actual speech.