Racial and Ethnic Diversity
Arizona has a large Latino population—25 percent according to the 2000 Census.[10] Some 11 percent of the state’s zip codes have Latino populations of 50 percent or more. Analysis shows that Clean Elections candidates are more likely to collect their contributions from zip codes with high percentages of Hispanics than are privately funded candidates. The chart below shows that Clean Elections candidates collected twice as much, proportionately, of their contributions from zip codes with the highest percentages of Hispanics than did privately funded candidates. In the zip codes with the lowest levels of Hispanics, privately funded candidates raised proportionately better than one-third more of their campaign cash than Clean Elections candidates did, 9.5 percent versus 6.8 percent.
An up close look at 2006 campaigns shows a similar pattern. Clean Elections candidates Goldwater and Napolitano raised proportionately more $5 qualifying contributions from zip codes with the highest Hispanic population than did U.S. Senate candidates. Munsil collected proportionately more from these zip codes than U.S. Senate candidate Kyl, but less than Pederson.
Looking at the 2002 candidates up close shows a more startling pattern. Clean Elections candidate Alfredo Gutierrez, himself a Latino, raised 2.7 times more contributions, proportionately, from zip codes with high Hispanic population than any other candidate, Clean Elections or privately funded. Clean Elections candidates Janet Napolitano and Richard Mahoney raised more proportionately from these zip codes than did privately funded candidate Matt Salmon.
American Indians comprise a smaller percentage of Arizona’s population—less than five percent (4.55)—than Latinos.[11] However, unlike other racial and ethnic groups in the state, this population is highly concentrated in specific zip codes. Indeed, more than ten percent of Arizona’s zip codes have populations that are more than 90 percent American Indian. Collectively, Clean Elections candidates were somewhat more likely to raise proportionately more of their contributions from zip codes with high percentages of American Indians as compared to privately funded candidates. The difference is more extreme in the zip codes with low levels of American Indians than it is in zip codes with high levels of American Indians. Here, privately funded candidates raised nearly three times more, proportionately, from the zip codes without many American Indians than did Clean Elections candidates.
We did not include analysis of contributions for African Americans because of the nature of their population patterns in Arizona, which is small and spread out. This makes an analysis by zip code uninformative. African Americans, or non-Hispanic blacks, made up less than three percent of the Arizona population in 2000. There are also very few zip codes with a population that is predominantly African American. Of all the zip codes in Arizona, about 62 percent have a percentage of African Americans of less than one percent, and 99 percent have a percentage less than 17 percent. The zip code with the highest percentage of African Americans is about 49 percent. There were no contributions from that zip code to any of the campaigns examined. [10] U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2004. Census of Population and Housing, 2000: Summary File 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. [11] Ibid. 513 reads
|
All Over the Map
ENewsletter Sign Up!
Voter Blog
Meet Your Candidates posted by Katie Schlieper on 08-28-2008 This is an interesting story on the campaign strategies of three Republicans competing for a state House seat, two of whom are running with Clean Elections funds. Notice the story opens up with one candidate walking door to door to talk to voters -- there's Clean Elections for you! Published in: Arizona | Clean Elections Next Up, New York? posted by Katie Schlieper on 08-27-2008 Depending on how the state legislative elections results shake out in New York come November we could be looking at much improved odds for passing a Clean Elections bill there in the coming year. New York Governor David Paterson (D) is certainly a supporter of Clean Elections, if not the most outspoken on the subject, and state activists are keeping up the drumbeat for movement on legislation -- see this letter to the editor in Binghamton. Published in: Clean Elections | New York Not This Time posted by Katie Schlieper on 08-27-2008 I'm sorry to report that Alaska's Clean Elections ballot initiative did not pass yesterday -- in fact, on the primary ballot where both Sen. Ted Stevens (R) and Rep. Don Young (R) faced primary challenges none of the ballot initiatives got much love. But as they say, Rome wasn't built in a day. This is only the beginning of Alaska's fight for Clean Elections. Published in: Alaska | Clean Elections | Don Young | Ted Stevens Creative Commons
|
powered by Drupal